We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.chem-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Physics > Chemical Physics

Title: Predicting Ligand-Dissociation Energies of 3d Coordination Complexes with Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo

Authors: Benjamin Rudshteyn (1), Dilek Coskun (1), John L. Weber (1), Evan J. Arthur (2), Shiwei Zhang (3 and 4), David R. Reichman (1), Richard A. Friesner (1), James Shee (1) ((1) Columbia University, (2) Schrodinger, (3) Flatiron Institute, (4) College of William and Mary)
Abstract: Transition metal complexes are ubiquitous in biology and chemical catalysis, yet they remain difficult to accurately describe with ab initio methods due to the presence of a large degree of dynamic electron correlation, and, in some cases, strong static correlation which results from a manifold of low-lying states. Progress has been hindered by a scarcity of high quality gas-phase experimental data, while exact ab initio predictions are usually computationally unaffordable due to the large size of the systems. In this work, we present a data set of 34 3d metal-containing complexes with gas-phase ligand-dissociation energies that have reported uncertainties of $\leq$ 2 kcal/mol. We perform all-electron phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) utilizing multi-determinant trial wavefunctions selected by a blackbox procedure. We compare the results with those from DFT with various functionals, and DLPNO-CCSD(T). We find MAE of 1.09 $\pm$ 0.28 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 2.89 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 1.57 - 3.87 kcal/mol for DFT. We find maximum errors of 2.96 $\pm$ 1.71 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 9.15 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 5.98 - 13.69 kcal/mol for DFT. The reasonable performance of several functionals is in stark contrast to the much poorer accuracy previously demonstrated for diatomics, suggesting a moderation in electron correlation due to ligand coordination. However, the unpredictably large errors for a small subset of cases with both DFT and DLPNO-CCSD(T) leave cause for concern, especially due to the unreliability of common multi-reference indicators. In contrast, the robust and, in principle, systematically improvable results of ph-AFQMC for these realistic complexes establish it as a useful tool for elucidating the electronic structure of transition metal-containing complexes and predicting their gas-phase properties.
Comments: 37 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph); Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el)
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00070
Cite as: arXiv:2001.07261 [physics.chem-ph]
  (or arXiv:2001.07261v1 [physics.chem-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Benjamin Rudshteyn [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:53:54 GMT (533kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.