Current browse context:
cs.LG
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title: To Split or Not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classification
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2020 (v1), last revised 14 Apr 2022 (this version, v4))
Abstract: Disparate treatment occurs when a machine learning model yields different decisions for individuals based on a sensitive attribute (e.g., age, sex). In domains where prediction accuracy is paramount, it could potentially be acceptable to fit a model which exhibits disparate treatment. To evaluate the effect of disparate treatment, we compare the performance of split classifiers (i.e., classifiers trained and deployed separately on each group) with group-blind classifiers (i.e., classifiers which do not use a sensitive attribute). We introduce the benefit-of-splitting for quantifying the performance improvement by splitting classifiers. Computing the benefit-of-splitting directly from its definition could be intractable since it involves solving optimization problems over an infinite-dimensional functional space. Under different performance measures, we (i) prove an equivalent expression for the benefit-of-splitting which can be efficiently computed by solving small-scale convex programs; (ii) provide sharp upper and lower bounds for the benefit-of-splitting which reveal precise conditions where a group-blind classifier will always suffer from a non-trivial performance gap from the split classifiers. In the finite sample regime, splitting is not necessarily beneficial and we provide data-dependent bounds to understand this effect. Finally, we validate our theoretical results through numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Submission history
From: Hao Wang [view email][v1] Wed, 12 Feb 2020 04:05:31 GMT (1459kb,D)
[v2] Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:13:28 GMT (1392kb,D)
[v3] Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:05:16 GMT (1393kb,D)
[v4] Thu, 14 Apr 2022 01:20:49 GMT (1393kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.