Current browse context:
cs.LG
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title: Can we have it all? On the Trade-off between Spatial and Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks
(Submitted on 26 Feb 2020 (v1), last revised 10 Nov 2021 (this version, v5))
Abstract: (Non-)robustness of neural networks to small, adversarial pixel-wise perturbations, and as more recently shown, to even random spatial transformations (e.g., translations, rotations) entreats both theoretical and empirical understanding. Spatial robustness to random translations and rotations is commonly attained via equivariant models (e.g., StdCNNs, GCNNs) and training augmentation, whereas adversarial robustness is typically achieved by adversarial training. In this paper, we prove a quantitative trade-off between spatial and adversarial robustness in a simple statistical setting. We complement this empirically by showing that: (a) as the spatial robustness of equivariant models improves by training augmentation with progressively larger transformations, their adversarial robustness worsens progressively, and (b) as the state-of-the-art robust models are adversarially trained with progressively larger pixel-wise perturbations, their spatial robustness drops progressively. Towards achieving pareto-optimality in this trade-off, we propose a method based on curriculum learning that trains gradually on more difficult perturbations (both spatial and adversarial) to improve spatial and adversarial robustness simultaneously.
Submission history
From: Sandesh Kamath K [view email][v1] Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:25:06 GMT (322kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 18 May 2020 13:32:03 GMT (521kb,D)
[v3] Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:46:08 GMT (508kb,D)
[v4] Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:28:42 GMT (783kb,D)
[v5] Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:26:37 GMT (823kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.