We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.SR

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Title: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional compressible convection in a pre-main sequence star

Abstract: Extending our recent studies of two-dimensional stellar convection to 3D, we compare three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations to identically set-up two-dimensional simulations, for a realistic pre-main sequence star. We compare statistical quantities related to convective flows including: average velocity, vorticity, local enstrophy, and penetration depth beneath a convection zone. These statistics are produced during stationary, steady-state compressible convection in the star's convection zone. Our simulations with the MUSIC code confirm the common result that two-dimensional simulations of stellar convection have a higher magnitude of velocity on average than three-dimensional simulations. Boundary conditions and the extent of the spherical shell can affect the magnitude and variability of convective velocities. The difference between 2D and 3D velocities is dependent on these background points; in our simulations this can have an effect as large as the difference resulting from the dimensionality of the simulation. Nevertheless, radial velocities near the convective boundary are comparable in our 2D and 3D simulations. The average local enstrophy of the flow is lower for two-dimensional simulations than for three-dimensional simulations, indicating a different shape and structuring of 3D stellar convection. We perform a statistical analysis of the depth of convective penetration below the convection zone, using the model proposed in our recent study (Pratt et al. 2017). Here we analyze the convective penetration in three dimensional simulations, and compare the results to identically set-up 2D simulations. In 3D the penetration depth is as large as the penetration depth calculated from 2D simulations.
Comments: 13 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
Journal reference: A&A 638, A15 (2020)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834736
Cite as: arXiv:2003.04643 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2003.04643v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jane Pratt [view email]
[v1] Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:33:50 GMT (4012kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.