We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.GA

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

Title: Exploring molecular complexity with ALMA (EMoCA): Complex isocyanides in Sgr B2(N)

Authors: E. R. Willis (1), R. T. Garrod (1 and 2), A. Belloche (3), H. S. P. Müller (4), C. J. Barger (1), M. Bonfand (3), K. M. Menten (3) ((1) Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, (2) Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, (3) Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, (4) I. Physikalisches Institut, Universit ät zu Köln)
Abstract: We used the EMoCA survey data to search for isocyanides in Sgr B2(N2) and their corresponding cyanide analogs. We then used the coupled three-phase chemical kinetics code MAGICKAL to simulate their chemistry. Several new species, and over 100 new reactions have been added to the network. In addition, a new single-stage simultaneous collapse/warm-up model has been implemented, thus eliminating the need for the previous two-stage models. A variable, visual extinction-dependent $\zeta$ was also incorporated into the model and tested. We report the tentative detection of CH$_3$NC and HCCNC in Sgr B2(N2), which represents the first detection of both species in a hot core of Sgr B2. Our updated chemical models can reproduce most observed NC:CN ratios reasonably well depending on the physical parameters chosen. The model that performs best has an extinction-dependent cosmic-ray ionization rate that varies from ~2 $\times$ 10$^{-15}$ s$^{-1}$ at the edge of the cloud to ~1 $\times$ 10$^{-16}$ s$^{-1}$ in the center. Models with higher extinction-dependent $\zeta$ than this model generally do not agree as well, nor do models with a constant $\zeta$ greater than the canonical value of 1.3 $\times$ 10$^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ throughout the source. Radiative transfer models are run using results of the best-fit chemical model. Column densities produced by the radiative transfer models are significantly lower than those determined observationally. Inaccuracy in the observationally determined density and temperature profiles is a possible explanation. Excitation temperatures are well reproduced for the true ``hot core'' molecules, but are more variable for other molecules such as HC$_3$N, for which fewer lines exist in ALMA Band 3.
Comments: 29 pages, 24 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Journal reference: A&A 636, A29 (2020)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936489
Cite as: arXiv:2003.07423 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2003.07423v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)

Submission history

From: Eric Willis [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:35:44 GMT (576kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.