### Current browse context:

quant-ph

### Change to browse by:

### References & Citations

# Quantum Physics

# Title: Superdeterministic hidden-variables models II: arbitrary conspiracy

(Submitted on 27 Mar 2020)

Abstract: We prove that superdeterministic models of quantum mechanics are arbitrarily conspiratorial in a mathematically well-defined sense, by further development of the ideas presented in a previous article $\mathcal{A}$. We consider a Bell scenario where, in each run and at each wing, the experimenter chooses one of $N$ devices to determine the local measurement setting. We prove, without assuming any features of quantum statistics, that superdeterministic models of this scenario must have a finely-tuned distribution of hidden variables. Specifically, fine-tuning is required in order for the measurement statistics to not depend on the outputs of the unused devices, or on the experimenter's choice of which device to use. We quantify this as the overhead fine-tuning $F$ of the model, and show that $F\to 1$ (corresponding to `completely fine-tuned') exponentially fast as $N \to \infty$. The notion of fine-tuning assumes that arbitrary (`nonequilibrium') hidden-variables distributions are possible in principle. We also show how to quantify the conspiracy from a different viewpoint, which requires us to consider only the equilibrium distribution for a given hidden-variables model. We define a formal entropy for superdeterministic models of our scenario, and show that it spontaneously decreases with time. The entropy drop $\Delta S \rightarrow \infty$ logarithmically fast as $N \to \infty$. Both approaches prove that superdeterministic models become arbitrarily conspiratorial as $N \to \infty$. We thus quantitatively confirm Bell's intuition that superdeterministic models are physically implausible.

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.