We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.LG

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Machine Learning

Title: Can AI help in screening Viral and COVID-19 pneumonia?

Abstract: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease, which has already caused thousands of causalities and infected several millions of people worldwide. Any technological tool enabling rapid screening of the COVID-19 infection with high accuracy can be crucially helpful to healthcare professionals. The main clinical tool currently in use for the diagnosis of COVID-19 is the Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which is expensive, less-sensitive and requires specialized medical personnel. X-ray imaging is an easily accessible tool that can be an excellent alternative in the COVID-19 diagnosis. This research was taken to investigate the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in the rapid and accurate detection of COVID-19 from chest X-ray images. The aim of this paper is to propose a robust technique for automatic detection of COVID-19 pneumonia from digital chest X-ray images applying pre-trained deep-learning algorithms while maximizing the detection accuracy. A public database was created by the authors combining several public databases and also by collecting images from recently published articles. The database contains a mixture of 423 COVID-19, 1485 viral pneumonia, and 1579 normal chest X-ray images. Transfer learning technique was used with the help of image augmentation to train and validate several pre-trained deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The networks were trained to classify two different schemes: i) normal and COVID-19 pneumonia; ii) normal, viral and COVID-19 pneumonia with and without image augmentation. The classification accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity for both the schemes were 99.7%, 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.55% and 97.9%, 97.95%, 97.9%, and 98.8%, respectively.
Comments: 12 pages, 9 Figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Journal reference: IEEE Access 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010287
Cite as: arXiv:2003.13145 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2003.13145v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

Submission history

From: Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury [view email]
[v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2020 21:37:21 GMT (3865kb)
[v2] Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:48:18 GMT (1031kb)
[v3] Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:43:36 GMT (1806kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.