We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantum Physics

Title: An Underappreciated Exchange in the Bohr--Einstein Debate

Abstract: The Bohr--Einstein debate is one of the more remarkable protracted intellectual exchanges in the history of physics. Its influence has been lasting: One of the few clear patterns in a 2013 survey about quantum foundations was that the physicists who believed Bohr to be correct were apt to say that Einstein had been wrong. The exchanges began when Bohr and Einstein first met in 1920, continued at the Solvay conferences of the following decade, reached a dramatic crescendo with the EPR paradox in 1935, and continued thereafter. Not every episode in this long story has been investigated equally. In particular, one late statement attributed to Bohr has received much more intense examination than Einstein's equally pithy reply.
Comments: presented at the Virtual Symposium on Borges and the Quantum, 32 March 2020 (session chair, Prof. W. Mozart)
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2003.14385 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2003.14385v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Blake Stacey [view email]
[v1] Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:29:32 GMT (4kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.