We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.EP

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics

Title: The origin of Neptune's unusual satellites from a planetary encounter

Abstract: The Neptunian satellite system is unusual, comprising Triton, a large ($\sim2700$ km) moon on a close-in, circular, yet retrograde orbit, flanked by Nereid, the largest irregular satellite ($\sim$300 km) on a highly eccentric orbit. Capture origins have been previously suggested for both moons. Here we explore an alternative in-situ formation model where the two satellites accreted in the circum-Neptunian disk and are imparted irregular and eccentric orbits by a deep planetary encounter with an ice giant (IG), like that predicted in the Nice scenario of early solar system development. We use $N$-body simulations of an IG approaching Neptune to 20 Neptunian radi ($R_\mathrm{Nep}$), through a belt of circular prograde regular satellites at 10-30 $R_\mathrm{Nep}$. We find that half of these primordial satellites remain bound to Neptune and that 0.4-3\% are scattered directly onto wide and eccentric orbits resembling that of Nereid. With better matches to the observed orbit, our model has a success rate comparable to or higher than capture of large Nereid-sized irregular satellites from heliocentric orbit. At the same time, the IG encounter injects a large primordial moon onto a retrograde orbit with specific angular momentum similar to Triton's in 0.3-3\% of our runs. While less efficient than capture scenarios (Agnor & Hamilton 2006), our model does indicate that an in-situ origin for Triton is dynamically possible. We also simulate the post-encounter collisional and tidal orbital evolution of Triton analogue satellites and find they are decoupled from Nereid on timescales of $\sim$$10^4$ years, in agreement with Cuk & Gladman (2005).
Comments: 6 figures; AJ 159 184
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7cd5
Cite as: arXiv:2004.02512 [astro-ph.EP]
  (or arXiv:2004.02512v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daohai Li [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:30:36 GMT (728kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.