We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Local Interpretability of Calibrated Prediction Models: A Case of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Test

Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) models are often complex and difficult to interpret due to their 'black-box' characteristics. Interpretability of a ML model is usually defined as the degree to which a human can understand the cause of decisions reached by a ML model. Interpretability is of extremely high importance in many fields of healthcare due to high levels of risk related to decisions based on ML models. Calibration of the ML model outputs is another issue often overlooked in the application of ML models in practice. This paper represents an early work in examination of prediction model calibration impact on the interpretability of the results. We present a use case of a patient in diabetes screening prediction scenario and visualize results using three different techniques to demonstrate the differences between calibrated and uncalibrated regularized regression model.
Comments: Submitted to the DSHealth 2020 workshop
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2006.13815 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2006.13815v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Primoz Kocbek [view email]
[v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:14:35 GMT (638kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.