We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: A comprehensive empirical power comparison of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for the Laplace distribution

Abstract: In this paper we present the results from an empirical power comparison of 40 goodness-of-fit tests for the univariate Laplace distribution, carried out using Monte Carlo simulations with sample sizes $n = 20, 50, 100, 200$, significance levels $\alpha = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10$, and 400 alternatives consisting of asymmetric and symmetric light/heavy-tailed distributions taken as special cases from 11 models. In addition to the unmatched scope of our study, an interesting contribution is the proposal of an innovative design for the selection of alternatives. The 400 alternatives consist of 20 specific cases of 20 submodels drawn from the main 11 models. For each submodel, the 20 specific cases corresponded to parameter values chosen to cover the full power range. An analysis of the results leads to a recommendation of the best tests for five different groupings of the alternative distributions. A real-data example is also presented, where an appropriate test for the goodness-of-fit of the univariate Laplace distribution is applied to weekly log-returns of Amazon stock over a recent four-year period.
Comments: 48 pages, 2 figures, 38 tables
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
MSC classes: 62F03
Journal reference: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (2022+)
Cite as: arXiv:2007.06154 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2007.06154v3 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Frédéric Ouimet [view email]
[v1] Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:06:50 GMT (124kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 10 May 2021 22:31:30 GMT (850kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 24 May 2022 03:08:29 GMT (7048kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.