We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.SI

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Social and Information Networks

Title: The Turing Test for Graph Drawing Algorithms

Abstract: Do algorithms for drawing graphs pass the Turing Test? That is, are their outputs indistinguishable from graphs drawn by humans? We address this question through a human-centred experiment, focusing on `small' graphs, of a size for which it would be reasonable for someone to choose to draw the graph manually. Overall, we find that hand-drawn layouts can be distinguished from those generated by graph drawing algorithms, although this is not always the case for graphs drawn by force-directed or multi-dimensional scaling algorithms, making these good candidates for Turing Test success. We show that, in general, hand-drawn graphs are judged to be of higher quality than automatically generated ones, although this result varies with graph size and algorithm.
Comments: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)
Subjects: Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68766-3_36
Cite as: arXiv:2008.04869 [cs.SI]
  (or arXiv:2008.04869v4 [cs.SI] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Archambault [view email]
[v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:20:48 GMT (4139kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:12:58 GMT (4140kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:38:30 GMT (4140kb,D)
[v4] Wed, 19 Aug 2020 08:52:49 GMT (4139kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.