We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.CA

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Classical Analysis and ODEs

Title: Approximation in the Zygmund and Hölder classes on $\mathbb{R}^n$

Abstract: We determine the distance (up to a multiplicative constant) in the Zygmund class $\Lambda_{\ast}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to the subspace $\mathrm{J}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n).$ The latter space is the image under the Bessel potential $J := (1-\Delta)^{-1/2}$ of the space $\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n),$ which is a non-homogeneous version of the classical $\mathrm{BMO}.$ Locally, $\mathrm{J}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n)$ consists of functions that together with their first derivatives are in $\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ More generally, we consider the same question when the Zygmund class is replaced by the H\"older space $\Lambda_{s}(\mathbb{R}^n),$ with $0 < s \leq 1$ and the corresponding subspace is $\mathrm{J}_{s}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n),$ the image under $(1-\Delta)^{-s/2}$ of $\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ One should note here that $\Lambda_{1}(\mathbb{R}^n) = \Lambda_{\ast}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ Such results were known earlier only for $n = s = 1$ with a proof that does not extend to the general case.
Our results are expressed in terms of second differences. As a byproduct of our wavelet based proof, we also obtain the distance from $f \in \Lambda_{s}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to $\mathrm{J}_{s}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n)$ in terms of the wavelet coefficients of $f.$ We additionally establish a third way to express this distance in terms of the size of the hyperbolic gradient of the harmonic extension of $f$ on the upper half-space $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{+}.$
Comments: 29 pages. Several modifications following the recommendations of the referees: correction of multiple typos, moving the explanation on the proof of Theorem 2 and the proof of Theorem 3 into a new section, and other minor changes to improve clarity. Accepted manuscript at Can. J. Math
Subjects: Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA)
MSC classes: 26B35
DOI: 10.4153/S0008414X21000523
Cite as: arXiv:2009.09752 [math.CA]
  (or arXiv:2009.09752v3 [math.CA] for this version)

Submission history

From: Odí Soler i Gibert [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:45:32 GMT (24kb)
[v2] Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:26:05 GMT (24kb)
[v3] Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:54:22 GMT (26kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.