We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.AP

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: Using sex and gender in survey adjustment

Abstract: Accounting for sex and gender is a challenge in social science research. While other methodology papers consider issues surrounding appropriate measurement, we consider the problem of adjustment for survey nonresponse and generalization from samples to populations in the context of the recent push toward measuring sex or gender as a non-binary construct. This is challenging not only in that response categories differ between sex and gender measurement, but also in that both these attributes are potentially multidimensional. We reflect on similarities to measuring race/ethnicity before considering the ethical and statistical implications of the options available to us. We present a simulation study to understand the statistical implications under a variety of scenarios, and demonstrate the application of the decision process with the New York City Poverty Tracker. Overall, we conclude not with a single best recommendation for all surveys but rather with an awareness of the complexity of the problem and the benefits and weaknesses of different approaches.
Comments: 16 Pages + 25 pages supplementary
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2009.14401 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2009.14401v2 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Simpson [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2020 02:59:35 GMT (1430kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 24 Mar 2022 03:11:21 GMT (7144kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.