We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.SR

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Title: ALMA observations and modeling of the rotating outflow in Orion Source I

Abstract: We present $^{29}$SiO(J=8--7) $\nu$=0, SiS (J=19--18) $\nu$=0, and $^{28}$SiO (J=8--7) $\nu$=1 molecular line archive observations made with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) of the molecular outflow associated with Orion Source I. The observations show velocity asymmetries about the flow axis which are interpreted as outflow rotation. We find that the rotation velocity ($\sim$4--8 km s$^{-1}$) decreases with the vertical distance to the disk. In contrast, the cylindrical radius ($\sim$100--300 au), the expansion velocity ($\sim$2--15 km s$^{-1}$), and the axial velocity $v_{\rm z}$ ($\sim$-1--10 km s$^{-1}$) increase with the vertical distance. The mass estimated of the molecular outflow $\mathrm{M}_{\rm outflow}\sim$0.66--1.3 M$_\odot$. Given a kinematic time $\sim$130 yr, this implies a mass loss rate $\dot{\mathrm{M}}_{\rm outflow} \sim 5.1-10 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. This massive outflow sets important contraints on disk wind models. We compare the observations with a model of a shell produced by the interaction between an anisotropic stellar wind and an Ulrich accretion flow that corresponds to a rotating molecular envelope in collapse. We find that the model cylindrical radii are consistent with the $^{29}$SiO(J=8--7) $\nu$=0 data. The expansion velocities and the axial velocities of the model are similar the observed values, except close to the disk ($z\sim\pm$150 au) for the expansion velocity. Nevertheless, the rotation velocities of the model are a factor $\sim$3--10 lower than the observed values. We conclude that the Ulrich flow alone cannot explain the rotation observed and other possibilities should be explored, like the inclusion of the angular momentum of a disk wind.
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe24
Cite as: arXiv:2010.00132 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2010.00132v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jesus Lopez-Vazquez [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:35:52 GMT (6149kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.