We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

Title: Do symmetries "explain" conservation laws? The modern converse Noether theorem vs pragmatism

Abstract: Noether's first theorem does not establish a one-way explanatory arrow from symmetries to conservation laws, but such an arrow is widely assumed in discussions of the theorem in the physics and philosophy literature. It is argued here that there are pragmatic reasons for privileging symmetries, even if they do not strictly justify explanatory priority. To this end, some practical factors are adduced as to why Noether's direct theorem seems to be more well-known and exploited than its converse, with special attention being given to the sometimes overlooked nature of Noether's converse result and to its strengthened version due to Luis Martinez Alonso in 1979 and Peter Olver in 1986.
Comments: Submitted to: The Physics and Philosophy of Noether's Theorems, James Read, Bryan Roberts and Nicholas Teh (Eds.) Cambridge University Press, forthcoming
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2010.10909 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:2010.10909v1 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Harvey R. Brown [view email]
[v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:42:03 GMT (27kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.