We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CC

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Computational Complexity

Title: Proof Compression and NP Versus PSPACE II: Addendum

Abstract: In [3] we proved the conjecture NP = PSPACE by advanced proof theoretic methods that combined Hudelmaier's cut-free sequent calculus for minimal logic (HSC) [5] with the horizontal compressing in the corresponding minimal Prawitz-style natural deduction (ND) [6]. In this Addendum we show how to prove a weaker result NP = coNP without referring to HSC. The underlying idea (due to the second author) is to omit full minimal logic and compress only \naive" normal tree-like ND refutations of the existence of Hamiltonian cycles in given non-Hamiltonian graphs, since the Hamiltonian graph problem in NP-complete. Thus, loosely speaking, the proof of NP = coNP can be obtained by HSC-elimination from our proof of NP = PSPACE [3].
[3] L. Gordeev, E. H. Haeusler, Proof Compression and NP Versus PSPACE II, Bulletin of the Section of Logic (49) (3): 213-230 (2020) this http URL [1907.03858]
[5] J. Hudelmaier, An O (n log n)-space decision procedure for intuitionistic propositional logic, J. Logic Computat. (3): 1-13 (1993)
[6] D. Prawitz, Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study. Almqvist & Wiksell, 1965
Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
Journal reference: Bulletin of the Section of Logic (51), 9 pp. (2022)
DOI: 10.18788/0138-0680.2022.01
Cite as: arXiv:2011.09262 [cs.CC]
  (or arXiv:2011.09262v2 [cs.CC] for this version)

Submission history

From: Lev Gordeev [view email]
[v1] Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:39:45 GMT (22kb)
[v2] Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:18:25 GMT (22kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.