We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Competition-based control of the false discovery proportion

Abstract: Recently, Barber and Cand\`es laid the theoretical foundation for a general framework for false discovery rate (FDR) control based on the notion of "knockoffs." A closely related FDR control methodology has long been employed in the analysis of mass spectrometry data, referred to there as "target-decoy competition" (TDC). However, any approach that aims to control the FDR, which is defined as the expected value of the false discovery proportion (FDP), suffers from a problem. Specifically, even when successfully controlling the FDR at level $\alpha$, the FDP in the list of discoveries can significantly exceed $\alpha$. We offer FDP-SD, a new procedure that rigorously controls the FDP in the competition (knockoff / TDC) setup by guaranteeing that the FDP is bounded by $\alpha$ at any desired confidence level. Compared with the just-published general framework of Katsevich and Ramdas, FDP-SD generally delivers more power and often substantially so in simulated as well as real data.
Comments: This revision focuses only on FDP-SD described in the original submission. A later submission will further develop the procedures for simultaneous bounds on the FDP
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2011.11939 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2011.11939v3 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Uri Keich [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:31:48 GMT (1055kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:02:27 GMT (1712kb,D)
[v3] Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:13:29 GMT (371kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.