Current browse context:
quant-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Quantum Physics
Title: Gull's theorem revisited
(Submitted on 1 Dec 2020 (v1), last revised 27 May 2022 (this version, v9))
Abstract: Steve Gull, in unpublished work available on his Cambridge University homepage, has outlined a proof of Bell's theorem using Fourier theory. Gull's philosophy is that Bell's theorem (or perhaps a key lemma in its proof) can be seen as a no-go theorem for a project in distributed computing with classical, not quantum, computers. We present his argument, correcting misprints and filling gaps. In his argument, there were two completely separated computers in the network. We need three in order to fill all the gaps in his proof: a third computer supplies a stream of random numbers to the two computers representing the two measurement stations in Bell's work. One could also imagine that computer replaced by a cloned, virtual computer, generating the same pseudo-random numbers within each of Alice and Bob's computers. Either way, we need an assumption of the presence of shared i.i.d. randomness in the form of a synchronised sequence of realisations of i.i.d. hidden variables underlying the otherwise deterministic physics of the sequence of trials. Gull's proof then just needs a third step: rewriting an expectation as the expectation of a conditional expectation given the hidden variables.
Submission history
From: Richard D. Gill [view email][v1] Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:29:13 GMT (13kb)
[v2] Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:21:09 GMT (15kb)
[v3] Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:46:48 GMT (15kb)
[v4] Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:44:28 GMT (21kb,D)
[v5] Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:37:20 GMT (22kb,D)
[v6] Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:49:53 GMT (24kb,D)
[v7] Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:05:15 GMT (24kb,D)
[v8] Fri, 20 May 2022 14:10:17 GMT (24kb,D)
[v9] Fri, 27 May 2022 08:58:19 GMT (24kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.