We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

eess.IV

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

Title: Deep cross-modality (MR-CT) educed distillation learning for cone beam CT lung tumor segmentation

Abstract: Despite the widespread availability of in-treatment room cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging, due to the lack of reliable segmentation methods, CBCT is only used for gross set up corrections in lung radiotherapies. Accurate and reliable auto-segmentation tools could potentiate volumetric response assessment and geometry-guided adaptive radiation therapies. Therefore, we developed a new deep learning CBCT lung tumor segmentation method. Methods: The key idea of our approach called cross modality educed distillation (CMEDL) is to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide a CBCT segmentation network training to extract more informative features during training. We accomplish this by training an end-to-end network comprised of unpaired domain adaptation (UDA) and cross-domain segmentation distillation networks (SDN) using unpaired CBCT and MRI datasets. Feature distillation regularizes the student network to extract CBCT features that match the statistical distribution of MRI features extracted by the teacher network and obtain better differentiation of tumor from background.} We also compared against an alternative framework that used UDA with MR segmentation network, whereby segmentation was done on the synthesized pseudo MRI representation. All networks were trained with 216 weekly CBCTs and 82 T2-weighted turbo spin echo MRI acquired from different patient cohorts. Validation was done on 20 weekly CBCTs from patients not used in training. Independent testing was done on 38 weekly CBCTs from patients not used in training or validation. Segmentation accuracy was measured using surface Dice similarity coefficient (SDSC) and Hausdroff distance at 95th percentile (HD95) metrics.
Comments: The paper has been accepted to Medical Physics
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14902
Cite as: arXiv:2102.08556 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2102.08556v3 [eess.IV] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jue Jiang Dr. [view email]
[v1] Wed, 17 Feb 2021 03:52:02 GMT (1545kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:40:20 GMT (1733kb,D)
[v3] Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:57:47 GMT (1732kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.