We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

econ.TH

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Economics > Theoretical Economics

Title: A Quest for Knowledge

Abstract: Is more novel research always desirable? We develop a model in which knowledge shapes society's policies and guides the search for discoveries. Researchers select a question and how intensely to study it. The novelty of a question determines both the value and the difficulty of discovering its answer. We show that the benefits of discoveries are non-monotone in novelty. Through a dynamic externality, moonshots -- research on questions more novel than myopically optimal -- can improve the evolution of knowledge. Incentivizing moonshots requires promising ex-post rewards. However, even a myopic funder combines rewards with ex-ante cost reductions to increase research effort.
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:2102.13434 [econ.TH]
  (or arXiv:2102.13434v5 [econ.TH] for this version)

Submission history

From: Johannes Schneider [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:47:00 GMT (1099kb,D)
[v2] Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:17:30 GMT (1876kb,D)
[v3] Sun, 2 May 2021 14:50:11 GMT (1520kb,D)
[v4] Mon, 7 Jun 2021 07:06:30 GMT (1773kb,D)
[v5] Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:04:16 GMT (2921kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.