Title: A Quest for Knowledge

Abstract: Is more novelty in research desirable? We develop a model in which knowledge shapes society's policies and guides the search for discoveries. Researchers select which question to study and to what extent. The novelty of the question determines both the value and the difficulty of discovering its answer. We show that the benefits of discoveries are non-monotone in novelty. Nevertheless, due to a dynamic externality, it can be optimal to incentivize research on distant discoveries to improve the evolution of knowledge. One reason is that the probability of a discovery and the novelty of the question are endogenously linked. They can be complements or substitutes depending on existing knowledge. We analyze cost reductions and research awards as instruments to incentivize research. While a benefit-maximizing funder's optimal funding mix depends on her budget in general, distant discoveries can only be incentivized through awards.