Current browse context:
q-bio.GN
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Statistics > Methodology
Title: A Critique of Differential Abundance Analysis, and Advocacy for an Alternative
(Submitted on 15 Apr 2021 (v1), last revised 7 Jun 2021 (this version, v2))
Abstract: It is largely taken for granted that differential abundance analysis is, by default, the best first step when analyzing genomic data. We argue that this is not necessarily the case. In this article, we identify key limitations that are intrinsic to differential abundance analysis: it is (a) dependent on unverifiable assumptions, (b) an unreliable construct, and (c) overly reductionist. We formulate an alternative framework called ratio-based biomarker analysis which does not suffer from the identified limitations. Moreover, ratio-based biomarkers are highly flexible. Beyond replacing DAA, they can also be used for many other bespoke analyses, including dimension reduction and multi-omics data integration.
Submission history
From: Thomas P Quinn [view email][v1] Thu, 15 Apr 2021 06:33:25 GMT (2091kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:23:10 GMT (3726kb,AD)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.