We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.HE

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Title: Long-term pulse period evolution of the ultra-luminous X-ray pulsar NGC 7793 P13

Authors: F. Fuerst (1), D. J. Walton (2), M. Heida (3), M. Bachetti (4), C. Pinto (5), M. J. Middleton (6), M. Brightman (7), H. P. Earnshaw (7), D. Barret (8), A. C. Fabian (2), P. Kretschmar (9), K. Pottschmidt (10 and 11), A. Ptak (11), T. Roberts (12), D. Stern (13), N. Webb (8), J. Wilms (14) ((1) Quasar SR for ESA/ESAC, (2) IoA Cambridge, (3) ESO Garching, (4) INAF-OAC, (5) INAF-IASF Palermo, (6) U Southampton, (7) Caltech, (8) CNRS IRAP, (9) ESA/ESAC, (10) CRESST UMBC, (11) NASA GSFC, (12) U Durham, (13) NASA JPL, (14) Remeis-Observatory Bamberg)
Abstract: Ultra-luminous X-ray pulsars (ULXPs) provide a unique opportunity to study super-Eddington accretion. We present the results of a monitoring campaign of ULXP NGC 7793 P13. Over our four-year monitoring campaign with Swift, XMM-Newton, and NuSTAR, we measured a continuous spin-up with $\dot P$ ~ -3.8e-11 s/s. The strength of the spin-up is independent of the observed X-ray flux, indicating that despite a drop in observed flux in 2019, accretion onto the source has continued at largely similar rates. The source entered an apparent off-state in early 2020, which might have resulted in a change in the accretion geometry as no pulsations were found in observations in July and August 2020. We used the long-term monitoring to update the orbital ephemeris and the periodicities seen in both the observed optical/UV and X-ray fluxes. We find that the optical/UV period is very stable over the years, with $P_\text{UV}$ = 63.75 (+0.17, -0.12) d. The best-fit orbital period determined from our X-ray timing results is 64.86 +/- 0.19 d, which is almost a day longer than previously implied, and the X-ray flux period is 65.21+/- 0.15 d, which is slightly shorter than previously measured. The physical origin of these different flux periods is currently unknown. We study the hardness ratio to search for indications of spectral changes. We find that the hardness ratios at high energies are very stable and not directly correlated with the observed flux. At lower energies we observe a small hardening with increased flux, which might indicate increased obscuration through outflows at higher luminosities. We find that the pulsed fraction is significantly higher at low fluxes. This seems to imply that the accretion geometry already changed before the source entered the deep off-state. We discuss possible scenarios to explain this behavior, which is likely driven by a precessing accretion disk.
Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Journal reference: A&A 651, A75 (2021)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140625
Cite as: arXiv:2105.04229 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2105.04229v1 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)

Submission history

From: Felix Fuerst [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 May 2021 09:43:48 GMT (1182kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.