We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Title: Efficient Deterministic Leader Election for Programmable Matter

Authors: Fabien Dufoulon (Technion - Israel Institute of Technology), Shay Kutten (Technion - Israel Institute of Technology), William K. Moses Jr. (University of Houston)
Abstract: It was suggested that a programmable matter system (composed of multiple computationally weak mobile particles) should remain connected at all times since otherwise, reconnection is difficult and may be impossible. At the same time, it was not clear that allowing the system to disconnect carried a significant advantage in terms of time complexity. We demonstrate for a fundamental task, that of leader election, an algorithm where the system disconnects and then reconnects automatically in a non-trivial way (particles can move far away from their former neighbors and later reconnect to others). Moreover, the runtime of the temporarily disconnecting deterministic leader election algorithm is linear in the diameter. Hence, the disconnecting -- reconnecting algorithm is as fast as previous randomized algorithms. When comparing to previous deterministic algorithms, we note that some of the previous work assumed weaker schedulers. Still, the runtime of all the previous deterministic algorithms that did not assume special shapes of the particle system (shapes with no holes) was at least quadratic in $n$, where $n$ is the number of particles in the system. (Moreover, the new algorithm is even faster in some parameters than the deterministic algorithms that did assume special initial shapes.)
Since leader election is an important module in algorithms for various other tasks, the presented algorithm can be useful for speeding up other algorithms under the assumption of a strong scheduler. This leaves open the question: "can a deterministic algorithm be as fast as the randomized ones also under weaker schedulers?"
Comments: PODC 2021
Subjects: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.01108 [cs.DC]
  (or arXiv:2106.01108v1 [cs.DC] for this version)

Submission history

From: Fabien Dufoulon [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:18:57 GMT (316kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.