We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

econ.TH

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

Title: Transaction Fee Mechanism Design

Abstract: Demand for blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum is far larger than supply, necessitating a mechanism that selects a subset of transactions to include "on-chain" from the pool of all pending transactions. This paper investigates the problem of designing a blockchain transaction fee mechanism through the lens of mechanism design. We introduce two new forms of incentive-compatibility that capture some of the idiosyncrasies of the blockchain setting, one (MMIC) that protects against deviations by profit-maximizing miners and one (OCA-proofness) that protects against off-chain collusion between miners and users.
This study is immediately applicable to a recent (August 5, 2021) and major change to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, based on a proposal called "EIP-1559." Historically, Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism was a first-price (pay-as-bid) auction. EIP-1559 suggested making several tightly coupled changes, including the introduction of variable-size blocks, a history-dependent reserve price, and the burning of a significant portion of the transaction fees. We prove that this new mechanism earns an impressive report card: it satisfies the MMIC and OCA-proofness conditions, and is also dominant-strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) except when there is a sudden demand spike. We also introduce an alternative design, the "tipless mechanism," which offers an incomparable slate of incentive-compatibility guarantees -- it is MMIC and DSIC, and OCA-proof unless in the midst of a demand spike.
Comments: Preliminary version appeared in the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC '21). This academic paper partially overlaps with the longer general-audience report published as arXiv:2012.00854
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.01340 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2106.01340v2 [cs.CR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Tim Roughgarden [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:48:32 GMT (49kb)
[v2] Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:24:51 GMT (34kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.