We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

eess.IV

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

Title: Now You See It, Now You Dont: Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Computational Pathology

Abstract: Deep learning models are routinely employed in computational pathology (CPath) for solving problems of diagnostic and prognostic significance. Typically, the generalization performance of CPath models is analyzed using evaluation protocols such as cross-validation and testing on multi-centric cohorts. However, to ensure that such CPath solutions are robust and safe for use in a clinical setting, a critical analysis of their predictive performance and vulnerability to adversarial attacks is required, which is the focus of this paper. Specifically, we show that a highly accurate model for classification of tumour patches in pathology images (AUC > 0.95) can easily be attacked with minimal perturbations which are imperceptible to lay humans and trained pathologists alike. Our analytical results show that it is possible to generate single-instance white-box attacks on specific input images with high success rate and low perturbation energy. Furthermore, we have also generated a single universal perturbation matrix using the training dataset only which, when added to unseen test images, results in forcing the trained neural network to flip its prediction labels with high confidence at a success rate of > 84%. We systematically analyze the relationship between perturbation energy of an adversarial attack, its impact on morphological constructs of clinical significance, their perceptibility by a trained pathologist and saliency maps obtained using deep learning models. Based on our analysis, we strongly recommend that computational pathology models be critically analyzed using the proposed adversarial validation strategy prior to clinical adoption.
Comments: 10 pages
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.08153 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2106.08153v2 [eess.IV] for this version)

Submission history

From: Amina Asif [view email]
[v1] Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:33:24 GMT (532kb)
[v2] Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:34:31 GMT (533kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.