We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Choosing the Causal Estimand for Propensity Score Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract: Matching and weighting methods for observational studies involve the choice of an estimand, the causal effect with reference to a specific target population. Commonly used estimands include the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT), the average treatment effect in the untreated (ATU), the average treatment effect in the population (ATE), and the average treatment effect in the overlap (i.e., equipoise population; ATO). Each estimand has its own assumptions, interpretation, and statistical methods that can be used to estimate it. This article provides guidance on selecting and interpreting an estimand to help medical researchers correctly implement statistical methods used to estimate causal effects in observational studies and to help audiences correctly interpret the results and limitations of these studies. The interpretations of the estimands resulting from regression and instrumental variable analyses are also discussed. Choosing an estimand carefully is essential for making valid inferences from the analysis of observational data and ensuring results are replicable and useful for practitioners.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.10577 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2106.10577v2 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Noah Greifer [view email]
[v1] Sat, 19 Jun 2021 22:00:05 GMT (250kb)
[v2] Tue, 11 Jul 2023 04:47:42 GMT (352kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.