We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Title: Efficient Sparse Matrix Kernels based on Adaptive Workload-Balancing and Parallel-Reduction

Abstract: Sparse matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplication (SpMV and SpMM) are fundamental in both conventional (graph analytics, scientific computing) and emerging (sparse DNN, GNN) domains. Workload-balancing and parallel-reduction are widely-used design principles for efficient SpMV. However, prior work fails to resolve how to implement and adaptively use the two principles for SpMV/MM. To overcome this obstacle, we first complete the implementation space with optimizations by filling three missing pieces in prior work, including: (1) We show that workload-balancing and parallel-reduction can be combined through a segment-reduction algorithm implemented with SIMD-shuffle primitives. (2) We show that parallel-reduction can be implemented in SpMM through loading the dense-matrix rows with vector memory operations. (3) We show that vectorized loading of sparse rows, being a part of the benefit of parallel-reduction, can co-exist with sequential-reduction in SpMM through temporally caching sparse-matrix elements in the shared memory. In terms of adaptive use, we analyze how the benefit of two principles change with two characteristics from the input data space: the diverse sparsity pattern and dense-matrix width. We find the benefit of the two principles fades along with the increased total workload, i.e. the increased dense-matrix width. We also identify, for SpMV and SpMM, different sparse-matrix features that impact workload-balancing effectiveness. Our design consistently exceeds cuSPARSE by 1.07-1.57x on different GPUs and dense matrix width, and the kernel selection rules involve 5-12% performance loss compared with optimal choices. Our kernel is being integrated into popular graph learning frameworks to accelerate GNN training.
Subjects: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)
Cite as: arXiv:2106.16064 [cs.DC]
  (or arXiv:2106.16064v2 [cs.DC] for this version)

Submission history

From: Guyue Huang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:45:47 GMT (913kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:18:14 GMT (1070kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.