Current browse context:
cs.GT
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
Title: Worst-Case Welfare of Item Pricing in the Tollbooth Problem
(Submitted on 12 Jul 2021 (v1), last revised 8 Jul 2022 (this version, v2))
Abstract: We study the worst-case welfare of item pricing in the \emph{tollbooth problem}. The problem was first introduced by Guruswami et al, and is a special case of the combinatorial auction in which (i) each of the $m$ items in the auction is an edge of some underlying graph; and (ii) each of the $n$ buyers is single-minded and only interested in buying all edges of a single path. We consider the competitive ratio between the hindsight optimal welfare and the optimal worst-case welfare among all item-pricing mechanisms, when the order of the arriving buyers is adversarial. We assume that buyers own the \emph{tie-breaking} power, i.e. they can choose whether or not to buy the demand path at 0 utility. We prove a tight competitive ratio of $3/2$ when the underlying graph is a single path (also known as the \emph{highway} problem), whereas item-pricing can achieve the hindsight optimal if the seller is allowed to choose a proper tie-breaking rule to maximize the welfare. Moreover, we prove an $O(1)$ upper bound of competitive ratio when the underlying graph is a tree.
For general graphs, we prove an $\Omega(m^{1/8})$ lower bound of the competitive ratio. We show that an $m^{\Omega(1)}$ competitive ratio is unavoidable even if the graph is a grid, or if the capacity of every edge is augmented by a constant factor $c$. The results hold even if the seller has tie-breaking power.
Submission history
From: Zihan Tan [view email][v1] Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:02:19 GMT (3342kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 8 Jul 2022 16:45:05 GMT (1734kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.