We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.OC

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

Title: Stochastic Relaxed Inertial Forward-Backward-Forward splitting for Monotone Inclusions in Hilbert spaces

Abstract: We consider monotone inclusions defined on a Hilbert space where the operator is given by the sum of a maximal monotone operator $T$ and a single-valued monotone, Lipschitz continuous, and expectation-valued operator $V$. We draw motivation from the seminal work by Attouch and Cabot on relaxed inertial methods for monotone inclusions and present a stochastic extension of the relaxed inertial forward-backward-forward (RISFBF) method. Facilitated by an online variance reduction strategy via a mini-batch approach, we show that (RISFBF) produces a sequence that weakly converges to the solution set. Moreover, it is possible to estimate the rate at which the discrete velocity of the stochastic process vanishes. Under strong monotonicity, we demonstrate strong convergence, and give a detailed assessment of the iteration and oracle complexity of the scheme. When the mini-batch is raised at a geometric (polynomial) rate, the rate statement can be strengthened to a linear (suitable polynomial) rate while the oracle complexity of computing an $\epsilon$-solution improves to $O(1/\epsilon)$. Importantly, the latter claim allows for possibly biased oracles, a key theoretical advancement allowing for far broader applicability. By defining a restricted gap function based on the Fitzpatrick function, we prove that the expected gap of an averaged sequence diminishes at a sublinear rate of $O(1/k)$ while the oracle complexity of computing a suitably defined $\epsilon$-solution is $O(1/\epsilon^{1+a})$ where $a>1$. Numerical results on two-stage games and an overlapping group Lasso problem illustrate the advantages of our method compared to stochastic forward-backward-forward (SFBF) and SA schemes.
Comments: Small clarifications in Section 4.2
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC)
MSC classes: 37H10, 49M37, 65C40, 65K15
Journal reference: Computational Optimization and Applications, 2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-022-00399-3
Cite as: arXiv:2107.10335 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2107.10335v2 [math.OC] for this version)

Submission history

From: Mathias Staudigl [view email]
[v1] Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:00:58 GMT (1004kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:57:54 GMT (1020kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.