References & Citations
Economics > Theoretical Economics
Title: Unweighted Condorcet Jury Theorem and Miracle of Aggregation do not hold almost surely
(Submitted on 2 Aug 2021 (this version), latest version 18 Jun 2022 (v4))
Abstract: Condorcet Jury Theorem or Miracle of Aggregation are frequently invoked to ensure the competence of some aggregate decision-making processes. In this article we explore an estimation of the prior probability of the thesis predicted by the theorem (if there are enough voters, majority rule is a competent decision procedure). We use tools from measure theory to conclude that, prima facie, it will fail almost surely. To update this prior either more evidence in favor of competence would be needed or a modification of the decision rule. Following the latter, we investigate how to obtain an almost sure competent information aggregation mechanism for almost any evidence on voter competence (including the less favorable ones). To do so, we substitute simple majority rule by weighted majority rule based on some weights correlated with epistemic rationality such that every voter is guaranteed a minimal weight equal to one.
Submission history
From: Álvaro Romaniega Sancho [view email][v1] Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:05:53 GMT (29kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:57:25 GMT (34kb,D)
[v3] Sun, 6 Feb 2022 11:35:14 GMT (82kb,D)
[v4] Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:25:44 GMT (83kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.