References & Citations
Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory
Title: Measurement Integrity in Peer Prediction: A Peer Assessment Case Study
(Submitted on 12 Aug 2021 (v1), last revised 22 Sep 2022 (this version, v2))
Abstract: We propose measurement integrity, a property related to ex post reward fairness, as a novel desideratum for peer prediction mechanisms in many natural applications. Like robustness against strategic reporting, the property that has been the primary focus of the peer prediction literature, measurement integrity is an important consideration for understanding the practical performance of peer prediction mechanisms. We perform computational experiments, both with an agent-based model and with real data, to empirically evaluate peer prediction mechanisms according to both of these important properties. Our evaluations simulate the application of peer prediction mechanisms to peer assessment -- a setting in which ex post fairness concerns are particularly salient. We find that peer prediction mechanisms, as proposed in the literature, largely fail to demonstrate significant measurement integrity in our experiments. We also find that theoretical properties concerning robustness against strategic reporting are somewhat noisy predictors of empirical performance. Further, there is an apparent trade-off between our two dimensions of analysis. The best-performing mechanisms in terms of measurement integrity are highly susceptible to strategic reporting. Ultimately, however, we show that supplementing mechanisms with realistic parametric statistical models can, in some cases, improve performance along both dimensions of our analysis and result in mechanisms that strike the best balance between them.
Submission history
From: Noah Burrell [view email][v1] Thu, 12 Aug 2021 04:06:19 GMT (9724kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:04:57 GMT (18909kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.