We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.AP

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: The promise and perils of point process models of political events

Abstract: Event data are increasingly common in applied political science research. While these data are inherently locational, political scientists predominately analyze aggregate summaries of these events as areal data. In so doing, they lose much of the information inherent to these point pattern data, and much of the flexibility that comes analyzing events using point process models. Recognizing these advantages, applied statisticians have increasingly utilized point process models in the analysis of political events. Yet, this work often neglects inherent limitations of political event data (e.g, geolocation accuracy), which can complicate the direct application of point process models. In this paper, we attempt to bridge this divide: introducing the benefits of point process modeling for political science research, and highlighting the unique challenges political science data pose for these approaches. To ground our discussion, we focus the Global Terrorism Database, using a univariate and bivariate log-Gaussian Cox process model (LGCP) to analyze terror attacks in Nigeria during 2014.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2108.12566 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2108.12566v2 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Lin Zhu [view email]
[v1] Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:15:38 GMT (649kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:12:28 GMT (961kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.