We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

Title: Creative Diversity: Patterns in the Creative Habits of ~10,000 People

Abstract: Despite popular media interest in uncovering the creative habits of successful people, there is a surprising paucity of empirical research on the diversity of tendencies and preferences people have when engaged in creative work. We developed a simple survey that characterized 42 creative habits along 21 independent dimensions. Data from 9,633 respondents revealed seven 'Creative Species', or clusters of people with combinations of creative habits that tend to co-occur more than expected by chance. These emergent clusters where relatively stable to random subsampling of the population and to variation in model parameters. The seven Creative Species self-sorted along a primary gradient from those characterized by more 'deliberate' creative habits (e.g., Monotasker, Risk Averse, Routine Seeker, Tenacious, Make it Happen) to those characterized by more 'open' creative habits (e.g. Multitasker, Risk Friendly, Novelty Seeker, Reframer, Let it Happen). A weaker second gradient was defined by outward and rational vs inward and intuitive creators. For the subset of respondents with data about their broad professional discipline (Art, Science, and Business) and gender, some groups were more (or less) common in some Creative Species than expected by chance, but the absolute magnitude of these differences were generally small; and knowing the discipline or gender of a person was not a good single predictor of their creative preferences or tendencies. Together these results suggest that independent of discipline or gender, people vary widely in the habits, behaviors, and contexts in which they feel most creative. Understanding creative diversity is critical for improving the creative performance of both individuals and collaborative teams.
Comments: 13 pages, 5 Figures, 1 Box, 2 Tables, Supplementary Information
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
Cite as: arXiv:2108.12759 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:2108.12759v2 [q-bio.QM] for this version)

Submission history

From: Eric Berlow [view email]
[v1] Sun, 29 Aug 2021 06:34:02 GMT (1057kb)
[v2] Thu, 2 Sep 2021 21:18:27 GMT (1055kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.