We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2109

Change to browse by:

physics
physics.hist-ph

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Reply to superdeterminists on the hidden-variable formulation of Invariant-set theory

Authors: Indrajit Sen
(Submitted on 23 Sep 2021)
Abstract: In a recent article (arXiv:2108.08144), Hance, Hossenfelder and Palmer have advanced arguments claiming to show that the analysis of Invariant-set theory in a hidden-variable setting (arXiv:2107.04761) is wrong. We explain here why these arguments are incorrect, and involve misunderstandings of the hidden-variable model in question and Bell's notion of local causality.
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2109.11109 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2109.11109v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Indrajit Sen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:37:58 GMT (46kb)
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.