We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: A Review and Critique of Auxiliary Information-Based Process Monitoring Methods

Abstract: We review the rapidly growing literature on auxiliary information-based (AIB) process monitoring methods. Under this approach, there is an assumption that the auxiliary variable, which is correlated with the quality variable of interest, has a known mean, or some other parameter, which cannot change over time. We demonstrate that violations of this assumption can have serious adverse effects both when the process is stable and when there has been a process shift. Some process shifts can become undetectable. We also show that the basic AIB approach is a special case of simple linear regression profile monitoring. The AIB charting techniques require strong assumptions. Based on our results, we warn against the use of AIB approach in quality control applications.
Comments: 21 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
MSC classes: 62P30
Cite as: arXiv:2110.00198 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2110.00198v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sven Knoth [view email]
[v1] Fri, 1 Oct 2021 03:56:33 GMT (151kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.