We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Applications

Title: Minding non-collapsibility of odds ratios when recalibrating risk prediction models

Abstract: In clinical prediction modeling, model updating refers to the practice of modifying a prediction model before it is used in a new setting. In the context of logistic regression for a binary outcome, one of the simplest updating methods is a fixed odds-ratio transformation of predicted risks to improve calibration-in-the-large. Previous authors have proposed equations for calculating this odds-ratio based on the discrepancy between the prevalence in the original and the new population, or between the average of predicted and observed risks. We show that this method fails to consider the non-collapsibility of odds-ratio. Consequently, it under-corrects predicted risks, especially when predicted risks are more dispersed (i.e., for models with good discrimination). We suggest an approximate equation for recovering the conditional odds-ratio from the mean and variance of predicted risks. Brief simulations and a case study show that this approach reduces under-correction, sometimes substantially. R code for implementation is provided.
Comments: 12 Pages, 1 Figure, 1567 words
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.08648 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2110.08648v3 [stat.AP] for this version)

Submission history

From: Mohsen Sadatsafavi [view email]
[v1] Sat, 16 Oct 2021 19:57:50 GMT (425kb)
[v2] Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:26:43 GMT (485kb)
[v3] Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:30:06 GMT (1244kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.