We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

Title: Combinatorial Algorithms for Rooted Prize-Collecting Walks and Applications to Orienteering and Minimum-Latency Problems

Abstract: We consider the rooted prize-collecting walks (PCW) problem, wherein we seek a collection $C$ of rooted walks having minimum prize-collecting cost, which is the (total cost of walks in $C$) + (total node-reward of nodes not visited by any walk in $C$). This problem arises naturally as the Lagrangian relaxation of both orienteering, where we seek a length-bounded walk of maximum reward, and the $\ell$-stroll problem, where we seek a minimum-length walk covering at least $\ell$ nodes. Our main contribution is to devise a simple, combinatorial algorithm for the PCW problem in directed graphs that returns a rooted tree whose prize-collecting cost is at most the optimum value of the prize-collecting walks problem.
We utilize our algorithm to develop combinatorial approximation algorithms for two fundamental vehicle-routing problems (VRPs): (1) orienteering; and (2) $k$-minimum-latency problem ($k$-MLP), wherein we seek to cover all nodes using $k$ paths starting at a prescribed root node, so as to minimize the sum of the node visiting times. Our combinatorial algorithm allows us to sidestep the part where we solve a preflow-based LP in the LP-rounding algorithms of Friggstand and Swamy (2017) for orienteering, and in the state-of-the-art $7.183$-approximation algorithm for $k$-MP in Post and Swamy (2015). Consequently, we obtain combinatorial implementations of these algorithms with substantially improved running times compared with the current-best approximation factors.
We report computational results for our resulting (combinatorial implementations of) orienteering algorithms, which show that the algorithms perform quite well in practice, both in terms of the quality of the solution they return, as also the upper bound they yield on the orienteering optimum (which is obtained by leveraging the workings of our PCW algorithm).
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
ACM classes: F.2.2; G.1.6; G.2
Cite as: arXiv:2111.07414 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:2111.07414v1 [cs.DS] for this version)

Submission history

From: Zachary Friggstad [view email]
[v1] Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:46:54 GMT (85kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.