Title: Tit for Tat: Cooperation, communication, and how each could stabilize the other

Abstract: Explanations for altruism, such as kin selection, reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, punishment, and genetic and cultural group selection, typically involve mechanisms that make altruists more likely to benefit from the altruism of others. Often, some form of signaling enables these mechanisms. Physical cues, for instance, help individuals recognize family members (kin selection) and others who have cooperated with them in the past (reciprocity). In the case of indirect reciprocity, where individuals cooperate with high-reputation individuals, signals help disseminate reputation information. But most accounts of indirect reciprocity take as given a truthful and misunderstanding-free communication system. In this paper, we seek to explain how such a communication system could remain evolutionarily stable in the absence of exogenous pressures. Specifically, we present three conditions that together allow signaling and cooperation to interact in a way that maintains both the effectiveness of the signal and the prevalence of cooperation. The conditions are that individuals (1) can signal about who is truthful, requiring a vital conceptual slippage between cooperation/defection and truthfulness/deceit, (2) make occasional mistakes, demonstrating how error can create stability by expressing unexpressed genes, and (3) use a "stern judging" norm that rewards defection against defectors, confirming that the norms encoded by a communication system determine its stability.