We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

quant-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Quantum Physics

Title: Calculable lower bounds on the efficiency of universal sets of quantum gates

Abstract: Currently available quantum computers, so called Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, are characterized by relatively low number of qubits and moderate gate fidelities. In such scenario, the implementation of quantum error correction is impossible and the performance of those devices is quite modest. In particular, the depth of circuits implementable with reasonably high fidelity is limited, and the minimization of circuit depth is required. Such depths depend on the efficiency of the universal set of gates $\mathcal{S}$ used in computation, and can be bounded using the Solovay-Kitaev theorem. However, it is known that much better, asymptotically tight bounds of the form $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{log}(\epsilon^{-1}))$, can be obtained for specific $\mathcal{S}$. Those bounds are controlled by so called spectral gap, denoted $\mathrm{gap}(\mathcal{S})$. Yet, the computation of $\mathrm{gap}(\mathcal{S})$ is not possible for general $\mathcal{S}$ and in practice one considers spectral gap at a certain scale $r(\epsilon)$, denoted $\mathrm{gap}_r(\mathcal{S})$. This turns out to be sufficient to bound the efficiency of $\mathcal{S}$ provided that one is interested in a physically feasible case, in which an error $\epsilon$ is bounded from below. In this paper we derive lower bounds on $\mathrm{gap}_r(\mathcal{S})$ and, as a consequence, on the efficiency of universal sets of $d$-dimensional quantum gates $\mathcal{S}$ satisfying an additional condition. The condition is naturally met for generic quantum gates, such as e.g. Haar random gates. Our bounds are explicit in the sense that all parameters can be determined by numerical calculations on existing computers, at least for small $d$. This is in contrast with known lower bounds on $\mathrm{gap}_r(\mathcal{S})$ which involve parameters with ambiguous values.
Comments: 22 pages, 2 figures, accepted in J. Phys. A after minor changes
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mathematical Physics (math-ph)
Journal reference: Oskar S{\l}owik and Adam Sawicki 2023 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 115304
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/acbd24
Cite as: arXiv:2201.11774 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2201.11774v3 [quant-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Oskar Słowik [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:38:13 GMT (23kb)
[v2] Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:17:48 GMT (25kb)
[v3] Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:14:03 GMT (81kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.