We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.CO

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Title: Fisher matrix for the one-loop galaxy power spectrum: measuring expansion and growth rates without assuming a cosmological model

Authors: Luca Amendola (Heidelberg University, Germany), Massimo Pietroni (University of Parma and INFN, Italy), Miguel Quartin (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Heidelberg University, Germany)
Abstract: We introduce a methodology to extend the Fisher matrix forecasts to mildly non-linear scales without the need of selecting a cosmological model. We make use of standard non-linear perturbation theory for biased tracers complemented by counterterms, and assume that the cosmological distances can be measured accurately with standard candles. Instead of choosing a specific model, we parametrize the linear power spectrum and the growth rate in several $k$ and $z$ bins. We show that one can then obtain model-independent constraints of the expansion rate $E(z)=H(z)/H_0$ and the growth rate $f(k,z)$, besides the bias functions. We apply the technique to both Euclid and DESI public specifications in the range $0.6\le z \le 1.8$ and show that the gain in precision when going from $k_{\rm max} = 0.1$ to $0.2\,h$/Mpc is around two- to threefold, while it reaches four- to ninefold when extending to $k_{\rm max} = 0.3\,h$/Mpc. In absolute terms, with $k_{\rm max}=0.2\,h/$Mpc, one can reach high precision on $E(z)$ at each $z$-shell: 8-10% for DESI with $\Delta z=0.1$, 5-6% for Euclid with $\Delta z=0.2-0.3$. This improves to 1-2% if the growth rate $f$ is taken to be $k$-independent. The growth rate itself has in general much weaker constraints, unless assumed to be $k$-independent, in which case the gain is similar to the one for $E(z)$ and uncertainties around 5-15% can be reached at each $z$-bin. We also discuss how neglecting the non-linear corrections can have a large effect on the constraints even for $k_{\rm max}=0.1\,h/$Mpc, unless one has independent strong prior information on the non-linear parameters.
Comments: v3: new appendix E discussing the AP effect under binning of mu and k; code upgraded to include non-diagonal beta(k) entries; accepted for publication in JCAP v2: corrected bug affecting high-k results; included extra FoG-related nuisance parameters; extended discussion and analysis; new Appendix D; 12 new references
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Journal reference: JCAP11(2022)023
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/023
Cite as: arXiv:2205.00569 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2205.00569v3 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)

Submission history

From: Miguel Quartin [view email]
[v1] Sun, 1 May 2022 22:02:43 GMT (603kb,D)
[v2] Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:40:18 GMT (966kb,D)
[v3] Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:42:57 GMT (1243kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.