We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Title: A Discrete Analog of General Covariance -- Part 2: Despite what you've heard, a perfectly Lorentzian lattice theory

Abstract: A crucial step in the history of General Relativity was Einstein's adoption of the principle of general covariance which demands a coordinate independent formulation for our spacetime theories. General covariance helps us to disentangle a theory's substantive content from its merely representational artifacts. It is an indispensable tool for a modern understanding of spacetime theories. Motivated by quantum gravity, one may wish to extend these notions to quantum spacetime theories (whatever those are). Relatedly, one might want to extend these notions to discrete spacetime theories (i.e., lattice theories). This paper delivers such an extension with surprising consequences, extending Part 1 (arXiv:2204.02276) to a Lorentzian setting.
This discrete analog of general covariance reveals that lattice structure is rather less like a fixed background structure and rather more like a coordinate system, i.e., merely a representational artifact. This discrete analog is built upon a rich analogy between the lattice structures appearing in our discrete spacetime theories and the coordinate systems appearing in our continuum spacetime theories. I argue that properly understood there are no such things as lattice-fundamental theories, rather there are only lattice-representable theories. It is well-noted by the causal set theory community that no theory on a fixed spacetime lattice is Lorentz invariant, however as I will discuss this is ultimately a problem of representational capacity, not of physics. There is no need for the symmetries of our representational tools to latch onto the symmetries of the thing being represented. Nothing prevents us from using Cartesian coordinates to describe rotationally invariant states/dynamics. As this paper shows, the same is true of lattices in a Lorentzian setting: nothing prevents us from defining a perfectly Lorentzian lattice(-representable) theory.
Comments: 46 pages, 10 figures. Part 1 (arXiv:2204.02276) Video abstract: see this https URL arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2204.02276
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Lattice (hep-lat); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2205.07701 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2205.07701v2 [gr-qc] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniel Grimmer [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 May 2022 14:10:09 GMT (3618kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 18 May 2022 10:42:18 GMT (3619kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.