We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Condensed Matter > Statistical Mechanics

Title: Regarding Flows Under the Free Energy Principle: A Comment on "How Particular is the Physics of the Free Energy Principle?" by Aguilera, Millidge, Tschantz, and Buckley

Abstract: In a recent technical critique of the free energy principle (FEP) due to Aguilera-Millidge-Tschantz-Buckley, it is argued that there are a number of instances where the FEP$\unicode{x2014}$as conventionally written, in terms of densities over states$\unicode{x2014}$is uninformative about the dynamics of many physical systems, and by extension, many 'things.' In this informal comment on their critique, I highlight two points of interest where their derivations are largely correct, but where their arguments are not fatal to the FEP. I go on to conjecture that a path-based formulation of the FEP has key features which restore its explanatory power in broad physical regimes. Correspondingly, this piece takes the position that the application of a state-based formulation of the FEP is inappropriate for certain simple systems, but, that the FEP can be expected to hold regardless.
Comments: Five pages. Invited comment
Subjects: Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems (nlin.AO); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Journal reference: Physics of Life Reviews, volume 42, 2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.05.009
Cite as: arXiv:2205.07793 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
  (or arXiv:2205.07793v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] for this version)

Submission history

From: Dalton Sakthivadivel [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 May 2022 16:30:18 GMT (9kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:38:28 GMT (9kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.