References & Citations
Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods
Title: Robust Estimation of Field Inhomogeneity Map Following Magnitude-Based Water-Fat Separation with Resolved Ambiguity
(Submitted on 17 Jun 2022 (v1), revised 1 Sep 2022 (this version, v3), latest version 14 Sep 2022 (v4))
Abstract: PURPOSE: To extend magnitude-based PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) and $R_2^*$ mapping with resolved water-fat ambiguity to calculate field inhomogeneity (field map) using the phase images.
THEORY: The estimation is formulated in matrix form, resolving the field map in a least-squares sense. PDFF and $R_2^*$ from magnitude fitting may be updated using the estimated field maps.
METHODS: The limits of quantification of our voxel-independent implementation were assessed. Bland-Altman was used to compare PDFF and field maps from our method against a reference complex-based method on 152 UK Biobank subjects (1.5 T Siemens). A separate acquisition (3 T Siemens) presenting field inhomogeneities was also used.
RESULTS: The proposed field mapping was accurate beyond double the complex-based limit range. High agreement was obtained between the proposed method and the reference in UK Biobank (PDFF bias = -0.03 %, LoA (limits of agreement) [-0.1,0.1] %; Field map bias = 0.06 Hz, LoA = [-0.2,0.3] Hz). Robust field mapping was observed at 3 T, for inhomogeneities over 300 Hz including rapid variation across edges.
CONCLUSION: Field mapping following magnitude-based water-fat separation with resolved water-fat ambiguity was demonstrated in-vivo and showed potential at high field.
Submission history
From: Alexandre Triay Bagur [view email][v1] Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:18:40 GMT (1729kb)
[v2] Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:10:34 GMT (1505kb)
[v3] Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:03:27 GMT (1729kb)
[v4] Wed, 14 Sep 2022 18:50:06 GMT (1784kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.