We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

econ.GN

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Economics > General Economics

Title: Simple models predict behavior at least as well as behavioral scientists

Authors: Dillon Bowen
Abstract: How accurately can behavioral scientists predict behavior? To answer this question, we analyzed data from five studies in which 640 professional behavioral scientists predicted the results of one or more behavioral science experiments. We compared the behavioral scientists' predictions to random chance, linear models, and simple heuristics like "behavioral interventions have no effect" and "all published psychology research is false." We find that behavioral scientists are consistently no better than - and often worse than - these simple heuristics and models. Behavioral scientists' predictions are not only noisy but also biased. They systematically overestimate how well behavioral science "works": overestimating the effectiveness of behavioral interventions, the impact of psychological phenomena like time discounting, and the replicability of published psychology research.
Comments: 21 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2208.01167 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2208.01167v1 [econ.GN] for this version)

Submission history

From: Dillon Bowen [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:00:08 GMT (247kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.