We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Combinatorics

Title: Minimum non-chromatic-$λ$-choosable graphs

Abstract: For a multi-set $\lambda=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_{\lambda} = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$.
A $\lambda$-list assignment of $G$ is a list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $\lambda$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $\lambda$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $\lambda$-choosability puts $k$-colourability and $k$-choosability in the same framework: If $\lambda = \{k\}$, then $\lambda$-choosability is equivalent to $k$-choosability; if $\lambda$ consists of $k $ copies of $1$, then $\lambda$-choosability is equivalent to $k $-colourability. If $G$ is $\lambda$-choosable, then $G$ is $k_{\lambda}$-colourable. On the other hand, there are $k_{\lambda}$-colourable graphs that are not $\lambda$-choosable, provided that $\lambda$ contains an integer larger than $1$. Let $\phi(\lambda)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a $k_{\lambda}$-colourable non-$\lambda$-choosable graph. This paper determines the value of $\phi(\lambda)$ for all $\lambda$.
Comments: 13 pages
Subjects: Combinatorics (math.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2208.02050 [math.CO]
  (or arXiv:2208.02050v1 [math.CO] for this version)

Submission history

From: Xuding Zhu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Aug 2022 13:18:14 GMT (15kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.