References & Citations
Mathematics > Combinatorics
Title: Totally non-negativity of a family of change-of-basis matrices
(Submitted on 25 Aug 2022 (v1), last revised 22 Jun 2023 (this version, v2))
Abstract: Let ${\bf a}=(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n)$ and ${\bf e}=(e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_n)$ be real sequences. Denote by $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ the $(n+1)\times(n+1)$ matrix whose $(m,k)$ entry ($m, k \in \{0,\ldots, n\}$) is the coefficient of the polynomial $(x-a_1)\cdots(x-a_k)$ in the expansion of $(x-e_1)\cdots(x-e_m)$ as a linear combination of the polynomials $1, x-a_1, \ldots, (x-a_1)\cdots(x-a_m)$. By appropriate choice of ${\bf a}$ and ${\bf e}$ the matrix $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ can encode many familiar doubly-indexed combinatorial sequences, such as binomial coefficients, Stirling numbers of both kinds, Lah numbers and central factorial numbers.
In all four of these examples, $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ enjoys the property of total non-negativity -- the determinants of all its square submatrices are non-negative. This leads to a natural question: when, in general, is $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ totally non-negative?
Galvin and Pacurar found a simple condition on ${\bf e}$ that characterizes total non-negativity of $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ when ${\bf a}$ is non-decreasing. Here we fully extend this result. For arbitrary real sequences ${\bf a}$ and ${\bf e}$, we give a condition that can be checked in $O(n^2)$ time that determines whether $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ is totally non-negative. When $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$ is totally non-negative, we witness this with a planar network whose weights are non-negative and whose path matrix is $M_{{\bf e}\rightarrow {\bf a}}$. When it is not, we witness this with an explicit negative minor.
Submission history
From: David Galvin [view email][v1] Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:29:54 GMT (14kb)
[v2] Thu, 22 Jun 2023 20:54:35 GMT (14kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.