We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CE

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

Title: Impact of Turbulence Modeling on the Simulation of Blood Flow in Aortic Coarctation

Authors: Sarah Katz (1), Alfonso Caiazzo (1), Baptiste Moreau (1), Ulrich Wilbrandt (1), Jan Brüning (2), Leonid Goubergrits (2 and 4), Volker John (1 and 3) ((1) Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (WIAS), Berlin, (2) Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, (3) Department of Mathematics and Compute Science, Freie Universität Berlin, (4) Einstein Center Digital Future, Berlin)
Abstract: Numerical simulations of pulsatile blood flow in an aortic coarctation require the use of turbulence modeling. This paper considers three models from the class of large eddy simulation (LES) models (Smagorinsky, Vreman, $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$-model) and one model from the class of variational multiscale models (residual-based) within a finite element framework. The influence of these models on the estimation of clinically relevant biomarkers used to assess the degree of severity of the pathological condition (pressure difference, secondary flow degree, normalized flow displacement, wall shear stress) is investigated in detail. The simulations show that most methods are consistent in terms of severity indicators such as pressure difference and stenotic velocity. The numerical results indicate that second order velocity elements outperform first order elements in terms of accuracy. Moreover, using second order velocity finite elements, different turbulence models might lead to considerably different results concerning other clinically relevant quantities such as wall shear stresses. These differences may be attributed to differences in numerical dissipation introduced by the turbulence models.
Comments: 30 pages, 22 figures. Submitted to International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects: Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2208.14217 [cs.CE]
  (or arXiv:2208.14217v2 [cs.CE] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sarah Katz [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:47:53 GMT (6153kb,D)
[v2] Thu, 1 Sep 2022 07:54:47 GMT (6148kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.