We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.SI

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Social and Information Networks

Title: Should we agree to disagree about Twitter's bot problem?

Authors: Onur Varol
Abstract: Bots, simply defined as accounts controlled by automation, can be used as a weapon for online manipulation and pose a threat to the health of platforms. Researchers have studied online platforms to detect, estimate, and characterize bot accounts. Concerns about the prevalence of bots were raised following Elon Musk's bid to acquire Twitter. Twitter's recent estimate that 5\% of monetizable daily active users being bot accounts raised questions about their methodology. This estimate is based on a specific number of active users and relies on Twitter's criteria for bot accounts. In this work, we want to stress that crucial questions need to be answered in order to make a proper estimation and compare different methodologies. We argue how assumptions on bot-likely behavior, the detection approach, and the population inspected can affect the estimation of the percentage of bots on Twitter. Finally, we emphasize the responsibility of platforms to be vigilant, transparent, and unbiased in dealing with threats that may affect their users.
Comments: 22 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.10006 [cs.SI]
  (or arXiv:2209.10006v2 [cs.SI] for this version)

Submission history

From: Onur Varol [view email]
[v1] Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:27:25 GMT (1052kb,D)
[v2] Sat, 5 Nov 2022 22:21:14 GMT (1103kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.